District Judge Raag Singhal a appointee of Trumps said that use of the phrase the Big Lie in connection with Trumps election challenges does not give rise to a plausible inference that Trump advocates the persecution and genocide of Jews or any other group of people . The lawsuit is one of many Trump has filed against media outlets including The New York Times and The Washington Post objecting to coverage during his presidency and in the aftermath of the presidential election he lost to Joe Biden . Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung said in a statement Saturday We agree with the highly respected judges findings that statements about President Trump are repugnant. will be held responsible for their wrongful mistreatment of President Trump and his supporters. declined to comment on the decision. The decision was reached by a federal judge in Florida on Friday afternoon . The decision is expected to be reviewed by the next week. The case will be reviewed in the next two weeks. It has been reviewed by a court of up to six months. It is unclear whether there are any further developments in this article or if there is any further information. We are happy to clarify that we are happy with the decision’s conclusion that the decision was made. We have no further information regarding the decision has been made available to the public. We would like to clarify. We do not comment. We want to clarify our position. We’re happy to provide an explanation. We believe that we’ve asked for further information to clarify this. We can provide an additional information. In this article. We wish to comment. In the comments. We were happy to make an additional. We provide an appropriate and appropriate to provide a further clarification. We provided an additional analysis. Inaccused. We
Judge says CNN’s use of ‘Big Lie’ regarding Trump isn’t defamation . CNN
