Justice Samuel Alito rejected calls from Democratic senators that he not participate in an upcoming tax case where one of the lawyers involved also participated in recent Wall Street Journal interviews of the conservative jurist . Alito in a court filing Friday said the argument for him to recuse was unsound and that there was no valid reason for him not to participate in the case . The case in question is a dispute that has caught the attention of some who fear it could vastly expand the federal taxing power . At issue is a provision of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of that mandates a tax on accumulated earnings of certain foreign corporations in which an individual owns shares . The justices are required to put favorable or unfavorable comments and any personal connections with an attorney out of our minds and judge the cases based solely on the law and the facts. And that is what we do. Alito said. He said that the justices are needed to put favourable or unfavorableComments out of their minds and that they must judge the case based on the facts and that we do not discuss any issue in that case either directly or indirectly. The case was disclosed in the second article and therefore readers could take that into account. His involvement in the first article was disclosed to the readers could . He said. His case was never mentioned nor did we discuss any Issue in that article. It is never mentioned in the . second article. His participation in the third article. was disclosed. He was never discussed in the Second article. and therefore . His involvement was disclosed and that readers could taken that into consideration. It was disclosed . His participation was disclosed from the second. He is not expected to be disclosed in an article. He did not mention. His . involvement in . his involvement in that