The fine print of the Respect for Marriage Act. By John Avlon. The Washington Post. Read the full story here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/post/the-fine-print-of-the-re

The fine print of the Respect for Marriage Act. By John Avlon. The Washington Post. Read the full story here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/post/the-fine-print-of-the-re

The Respect for Marriage Act codifies marriages and came about amid worries among Democrats that the same conservative majority on the Supreme Court that took away the right to abortion will target same-sex marriage in the future. The version that overcame a filibuster in the Senate passed the Senate Tuesday. A dozen Republican senators from across the country voted with Democrats before Thanksgiving to limit debate and move toward a final vote. RELATED: Meet the 12 Republicans who voted to consider the Respect for Marriage Act It next goes to the House for approval before President Joe Biden can sign it into law. But there is a fair amount of fine print. First, the bill does not require all states to allow same-sex marriage, even though that is the current reality under the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision. Rather, if the Supreme Court overturned Obergefell and previous state prohibitions on same-sex marriage came back into effect, the Respect for Marriage Act would require states and the federal government to respect marriages conducted in places where it is legal. There are religious exceptions. Republican supporters have emphasized the elements in this Senate version that protect nonprofit and religious organizations from having to provide support for same-sex marriages. “I will be supporting the substitute amendment because it will ensure our religious freedoms are upheld and protected, one of the bedrocks of our democracy,” said West Virginia Sen Moore Capito in a statement after helping break the filibuster. It took months of behind-the-scenes effort to bring 10-plus Republicans on board. This is all academic right now. The bill is only being passed in case the now-solidly conservative Supreme Court, which has taken delight in upending precedent, were to revisit the Obergefell v. Hodges decision Let story first ran in July. It also appears in ‘s What Matters newsletter. To get it in your inbox, sign up for free here. — Let’s start with the positive: Republicans and Democrats are coming together to protect same-sex marriage from the Supreme Court. The Respect for Marriage Act codifies marriages and came about amid worries among Democrats that the same conservative majority on the Supreme If you’re reading this article on the web or via email, please click/_(y)> (s, a ‘s newest, most exciting, and best-known, feature, is a ‘s newest, [[[[[[[]]]]]]]]]]”]”]bunny, a <img src=iming, a href=http://www.youngadultmovarmemories.comndernegotisements, as

khawajausman

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read also x